Today's profile in the New York Times of how alleged criminal activity by football players at Florida State University is handled by the university community is the latest news account about professional athletes
(whether NCAA or major league) apparently engaging in criminal behavior without
consequence. And, while it would seem to
be critical of one particular university community and one particular group of
professional athletes, you could write this story about big-time sports
programs anywhere. The problem isn't
really Florida State, or Penn State or the Baltimore Ravens. The problem in some large measure is the
result of our culture of celebrity - i.e., famous people are better than the
rest of us and have our blessing to do whatever the hell they want - which has
allowed certain famous athletes (along with other famous people) who may be
very talented, but lack morals or judgment or integrity, to engage in bad
behavior without consequence.
Who's at fault?
Obviously, the individuals, who are responsible for their own conduct. But, the rest of us bear some responsibility,
too. There's the group of people who
make a lot of money off of these famous athletes. Hardly free of conflicts of interest and
there are plenty of examples of this group doing the wrong thing in response
because of what's at stake for their own personal interests. As concerns sexual assault crimes, there is
the pervasive societal evil that continues to demonize victims of sexual crimes
by suggesting that their own behavior contributes to their victimization. It does not and it never has, but if you
don't think that view is widely held and a serious part of the problem,
consider that blowhard columnist George Will recently wrote in the Washington Post to suggest that women
are clamoring to be sexual assault victims on college campuses for its
"coveted" status. And, this
alleged human being has a wife and daughters.
And, there are the fans and supporters who, being far removed from the
consequences of such criminal actions, are able to focus on the entertainment
value of victories linked to these athletes, while putting emotional and
intellectual distance between the criminal behavior and their own lives.